The epistemology problem never goes away. How should I have any confidence that it's correctly flagging things for review? I need to go through 28800 documents

The epistemology problem never goes away. How should I have any confidence that it's correctly flagging things for review? I need to go through 28800 documents to see if it missed anything. You're right, I am comparing it to that alternative. There are fields and applications where this is necessary. I do not know if drilling reports are one of them. If you can tolerate a large false negative rate then great. But if you need to be catching 99.99% of problems then IMO you should at least be able to show your work. Taking black box output and throwing it over the wall sounds so sketchy in engineering contexts.