3 ms·
> when the alternative is total obliteration you can crush video down to 1MB per minute and have a tolerable VHS-like experience That's still pushing a terabyt
by robertlagrant 2y ago
> when the alternative is total obliteration you can crush video down to 1MB per minute and have a tolerable VHS-like experience
That's still pushing a terabyte a day[0] on YouTube alone. What about TikTok as well?
[0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/259477/hours-of-video-uploaded-to-youtube-every-minute https://www.statista.com/statistics/259477/hours-of-video-up...
- estebank 2y agoSo, a single laptop hard drive a day? 50 tape drives a year? For the biggest repository of video there is? That's literally peanuts. There's some logistics in handling backup tapes, but that's a well understood process.
- Dylan16807 2y agoI think you undershot that by a factor of 60. But when I said "get picky" I meant things like not archiving all of youtube. And for articles specifically, archiving every video article is a lot smaller. https://routenote.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/pex-youtube-analysis-2019-total-videos-tiers-700x475.png https://routenote.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/pex-yo... And going by this, restricting to a reasonable view count will cut the space you need by a factor of 10 to 25. If we round that to a petabyte per year, it's not in the range of a typical personal archive, but it's a reasonable thing to picture several big libraries doing. (Though a single person could handle that much if they really wanted to, spending $10 a day on data tapes.)