0.2mm per side? Wow that’s smaller than I’d expect. Thanks. The increased losses due to cutting make sense too. I was expecting the cuts to be wider than 20 µm

0.2mm per side? Wow that’s smaller than I’d expect. Thanks. The increased losses due to cutting make sense too. I was expecting the cuts to be wider than 20 µm, so that’s not actually as bad as I was imagining.