3 ms·
Really don't. If that crate becomes successful, it will basically greenlight a lot of functionality that was just there because it happened to be made by the s
by marcosdumay 2y ago
Really don't.
If that crate becomes successful, it will basically greenlight a lot of functionality that was just there because it happened to be made by the same author. And all that extra functionality will only reduce the chances of the really useful function to get into the spotlight. Both are bad for the ecosystem.
If the GP has related useful little functions, yes, pack them together. Otherwise, I'd say a crate for a small little function isn't a problem at all.
- pryelluw 2y agoInteresting how it was perceived me suggesting they publish a crate with multiple unrelated functionality. My point is that I keep my own little collection of useful code. I don’t publish it as a package or crate. It’s what I suggested to the other poster.