3 ms·
> We could just as easily have called it "black" or "white" charge And when we found a charge system that had 3 charges rather than just two, we did.
by philipov 2y ago
> We could just as easily have called it "black" or "white" charge
And when we found a charge system that had 3 charges rather than just two, we did.
- lynndotpy 2y agoWhere can I learn more on this? Searching yields nothing.
- tekno45 2y agohttps://youtu.be/AOtUo25GB3c?list=TLPQMjEwNjIwMjQajcfSE5215w https://youtu.be/AOtUo25GB3c?list=TLPQMjEwNjIwMjQajcfSE5215w Kinda
- warhorse10_9 2y agoRead up on “color charge.”
- frutiger 2y agoQuarks and gluons, or quantum chromodynamics
- bradboimler 2y agoI imagine they're referring to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics
- mr_mitm 2y agoIt's either six vs two, or three vs one, depending on what you mean by charge. The quarks and gluons can be red, blue, green, antired, antiblue, or antigreen.
- philipov 2y agoI was hoping someone would catch that ;)
- Dylan16807 2y agoWhy?
- philipov 2y agoIt means someone is paying attention. When introducing the topic, it's more effective to say that electricity has 2 charges while chromodynamics has 3, and let them discover that those numbers are using different units for "2" and "3" only after they decide to find out more. Carefully qualifying every single statement causes people to stop listening, because they don't care. It's better to correct oneself after-the-fact. Make it a topic of discussion once people are hooked. Introducing a simple error for someone to unravel does that.
- Dylan16807 2y agoThat strikes me as a bad way to make a forum post.