Please, your first response to me was full of sneer and snark. Don't cry about it now. I don't see any response to my points about markman hearings and the moti

Please, your first response to me was full of sneer and snark. Don't cry about it now. I don't see any response to my points about markman hearings and the motion to dismiss deadlines, just more and more about how litigants shouldn't select judges (but it is somehow okay for big tech companies to do it!) when the western district has already changed its case assignment rules... >I would want further information. I've never seen anything substantive that claims that such procedural matters are the chief concern of people who have an issue with the Eastern District. Usually, it's things like the above. You don't know what you are talking about because you don't litigate patents and you just consume pearl clutching media from anti-patent sources. Patent plaintiffs go to those jurisdictions for that reason, Albright isn't particularly friendly to Plaintiffs, but you don't realize that, you just think they chose them because.... you can't explain why. Albright was a big law patent partner, working almost exclusively for the defense. It'd be nice if you could actually get on point here. Do you have any evidence that shows Albright produces plaintiff-favorable outcomes? No, just pearl clutching.