3 ms·
> this can mean building some untrivial infra As someone that does it all the time on 10b+ record tables, not really? if you don't have extra resources to buil
by winrid 2y ago
> this can mean building some untrivial infra
As someone that does it all the time on 10b+ record tables, not really? if you don't have extra resources to build the occasional index your DB is under-provisioned and you're close to falling over, cluster or not.
- riku_iki 2y ago10b+ record table and trillions indexed rows on single machine are very different tasks.
- winrid 2y agoah I forgot grandparent comment said trillion. yeah that's an order of magnitude I would distribute across a cluster if we were in active development and indexes were changing etc. if you're storing that much data you should be able to afford it :)