26 ms·
imo the protection is real and a good tradeoff for a research project to become a mass medium (i.e. clients usually don't want incoming connections from the int
by sambazi 2y ago
imo the protection is real and a good tradeoff for a research project to become a mass medium (i.e. clients usually don't want incoming connections from the internet[1])
don't get me wrong, i like a global address space as much as the next internet native, but it's not for everyone to pay the price for it and nat makes it easy to opt-out of a large portion of the problem space.
[1]
my university used to give public-routed v4 to students connecting their winxp laptop to the network; guess what happend
- fulafel 2y agoThis seems to suffer from the common reasoning error of equating addressability with reachability. Your university can disable public reachability without NAT eg using firewalling.