4 ms·
I remember when AJAX made things faster. Then we stopped sending html to insert into the DOM, and started sending JSON with a bunch of extra steps in between.
by vundercind 2y ago
I remember when AJAX made things faster.
Then we stopped sending html to insert into the DOM, and started sending JSON with a bunch of extra steps in between.
The fastest sites I see these days usually just reload the whole page pretty often.
- tracker1 2y agoHTMX for the win!
- INGSOCIALITE 2y agohtmx is an answer to a question no one asked
- gumby 2y agoThe IPv6 of markup?
- ehPReth 2y agoi do like not having NAT :)
- busterarm 2y agoNor do I like IP space being an overallocated and hoarded asset.
- ungamedplayer 2y agoI feel like grandparent poster probably doesn't know the upsides of IPv6.
- gumby 2y agoI do actually remember following its development, hate NAT, and of course feel constrained by the V4 32-bit address space. But V6 has its designs problems too and while over the years I’ve tried to use it, it has never been worth the hassle and, yes, is slower (probably because most connections are to V4-only sites).
- ungamedplayer 2y agoOk.
- gumby 2y agoBut I do think my joke wasn't very good, in retrospect so your comment is not surprising.
- alex_lav 2y agoI asked!
- recursivedoubts 2y agoexactly, they should have!
- marcosdumay 2y agoReloading the entire page is very fast nowadays. Most of the need AJAX was created to solve disappeared.