4 ms·

Where exactly you crossed the line is a question for the courts. I am not a lawyer and will there for not help with the specifics. However, please see the Aere

Where exactly you crossed the line is a question for the courts. I am not a lawyer and will there for not help with the specifics. However, please see the Aereo case [0] for a possibly analogous case. I am allowed to have a DVR. There is no law preventing me from accessing my DVR over a network. Or possibly even colocating it in a local data center. But Aereo definitely crossed a line. Also see Vidangel [1]. The fact that something is legal to do at home, does not mean that I can offer it as a cloud service. [0] https://www.vox.com/2018/11/7/18073200/aereo https://www.vox.com/2018/11/7/18073200/aereo [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_v._VidAngel https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_v._VidAngel

Dylan16807 2y ago
Which is offensive and the legal structure underlying that should be changed. Renting out machines, where a person could legally install and use the exact same machine, makes zero sense to count as "distribution".
nobody9999 2y ago
>Where exactly you crossed the line is a question for the courts. I am not a lawyer and will there for not help with the specifics. I expect you're right. Although Perplexity thinks they're well within the law[0]. Are they correct? I guess we'll see.... [0] https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Why-are-you-2wJteqZ4SUCqPjk.zZdF8g https://www.perplexity.ai/search/Why-are-you-2wJteqZ4SUCqPjk...