3 ms·
I think they are saying that you need to switch to 199.999... lbs/s for all the 200 lbs/s burns, not just the last one. Just trying to clarify where you seem t
by necovek 2y ago
I think they are saying that you need to switch to 199.999... lbs/s for all the 200 lbs/s burns, not just the last one.
Just trying to clarify where you seem to be speaking past each other, though it seems that this might simply lead to a non-optimal strategy (i.e. taking more time to land than theoretically possible, however minute the difference is).
- schiffern 2y ago>switch to 199.999... lbs/s for all the 200 lbs/s burns, not just the last one That's not it. See here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40685081 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40685081
- konstantinua00 2y agospeaking of speaking past each other > and then replace one of the subsequent 200 lbs/second inputs with 199.99999999 lbs/second > replace one indeed not the last one, but no, not "all"