3 ms·
I tried with a nonexistent path, here are the user agents I got: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.
by oefrha 2y ago
I tried with a nonexistent path, here are the user agents I got:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
It's apparently built to evade detection.
- moneywoes 2y agowhat sort of evasion technique is being used here, random user agents on each attempt?
- CaptainOfCoit 2y ago> what sort of evasion technique is being used here Using a user-agent that looks like a desktop user-agent, rather than including the name of the actual project/product that is being used. I understand why though, plenty of websites block anything that looks like non-desktop/mobile user-agents, so makes sense. Besides the pragmatic reason, I also agree with menacingly that it doesn't matter, people should be able to use whatever user-agent they want to access the content you've put publicly on the internet.
- menacingly 2y agothe more reasonable assumption is that it uses a third party crawl service. but still, it doesn't matter, it's acting on behalf of a user, and you aren't entitled to know what software your users run. One consequence of putting stuff on the public internet is that it's like public.