3 ms·

> I'm sorry but you are still avoiding my topic. Is or isn't Israel singled out by the UN? Honestly, I haven't read more than a couple sentences of these obses

> I'm sorry but you are still avoiding my topic. Is or isn't Israel singled out by the UN? Honestly, I haven't read more than a couple sentences of these obsessive rants in 3 comments, just enough to check what you've learned about the UN so far. This isn't behavior I expect to see on HN, and after reviewing the thread, it looks like its a consistent issue, across multiple threads: you ask questions addressed long ago, claim people aren't answering them, then go rabid with page after page telling us the answer. Thanks for your insightful contributions.

nsguy 2y ago
I am coming to this from an emotional point for sure. And ranting. This is what our discussion looks like from my perspective. > you have to be of a very specific mindset to see message after message about the evil UN and not say, "uh, did we go off the rails somewhere?" Me: "We can measure "unjustly singled out"" + China and the Uyghurs is one example we can look at. > The China claims are straight up lies False. Then you try to weasel your way out of that. > the implication that other human rights abuses aren't policed is another google-able lie False. You refuse to engage on any factual basis to support your incorrect statement. > Please don't troll me. > I haven't read more than a couple sentences of these obsessive rants > This isn't behavior I expect to see on HN > it looks like its a consistent issue, across multiple threads: you ask questions addressed long ago You did not actually address any question I had for you. [EDIT: deleted]
- refulgentis 2y ago
  I mean, you said it yourself, you found the UN criticizing Uyghurs. Then, we can also find Uyghurs have bombed and missiled Beijing. You lied, sorry. Then you went off on me, a Zionist, about how I'm yelling apartheid(?). Then you went off about how the security council (with China on it??) is the real measure. Then you went off on I never answered if I thought UN was biased against Israel compared to China (???) We can start again from there if your interest here is curiosity. Is it?
  - nsguy 2y ago
    I just want to apologize for part of the tone of my response. I don't think we're gonna get anywhere here otherwise. [EDIT: I'll take 50% of the blame for this going sideways.]
    - refulgentis 2y ago
      Cheers, you are a better man than I (I also apologize but you got there first and meant it, I wouldn't have)

nsguy 2y ago

I am coming to this from an emotional point for sure. And ranting. This is what our discussion looks like from my perspective. > you have to be of a very specific mindset to see message after message about the evil UN and not say, "uh, did we go off the rails somewhere?" Me: "We can measure "unjustly singled out"" + China and the Uyghurs is one example we can look at. > The China claims are straight up lies False. Then you try to weasel your way out of that. > the implication that other human rights abuses aren't policed is another google-able lie False. You refuse to engage on any factual basis to support your incorrect statement. > Please don't troll me. > I haven't read more than a couple sentences of these obsessive rants > This isn't behavior I expect to see on HN > it looks like its a consistent issue, across multiple threads: you ask questions addressed long ago You did not actually address any question I had for you. [EDIT: deleted]

refulgentis 2y ago
I mean, you said it yourself, you found the UN criticizing Uyghurs. Then, we can also find Uyghurs have bombed and missiled Beijing. You lied, sorry. Then you went off on me, a Zionist, about how I'm yelling apartheid(?). Then you went off about how the security council (with China on it??) is the real measure. Then you went off on I never answered if I thought UN was biased against Israel compared to China (???) We can start again from there if your interest here is curiosity. Is it?
- nsguy 2y ago
  I just want to apologize for part of the tone of my response. I don't think we're gonna get anywhere here otherwise. [EDIT: I'll take 50% of the blame for this going sideways.]
  - refulgentis 2y ago
    Cheers, you are a better man than I (I also apologize but you got there first and meant it, I wouldn't have)