4 ms·
This improves modeling of long-tail distributions? How far off am I here?
by ganzuul 2y ago
This improves modeling of long-tail distributions? How far off am I here?
- gus_massa 2y agoIf the complex number is x+iy: They had a good bound of the long-tail distribution when x>=3/5=0.6. Now someone extended that result to x>=13/25=0.52. (The long term objective is to prove a stronger version for x>1/2=.5.)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- konstantinua00 2y agoit's different affected distribution is always x>3/4, both before and after what's measured is upper bound on number of zeroes <y, relative to y it was <y^(3/5), now it's <y^(13/25) it says nothing about absence of zeroes, but the density result already affects prime distributions
- gus_massa 2y agoMy bad. Thanks for the correction.
- lupire 2y agoCan you be more specific? This is a result about a specific approximately known distribution.
- ganzuul 2y agoExcuse me I meant the related heavy-tailed distributions, which show up in dragon king theory. I'm wondering if this result indicates we have a new method to eke out important signals from noise that otherwise get smoothed out.