4 ms·

> It would be much better if a tiny bit of JavaScript told you as soon as you put the date in, and if it had a "tomorrow" button, which would also require some

> It would be much better if a tiny bit of JavaScript told you as soon as you put the date in, and if it had a "tomorrow" button, which would also require some JavaScript. There's so much research that shows the opposite. You might prefer that but government websites need to work for everyone, and showing validation messages automatically confuses less technically able people, and it's really hard to make it fully accessible. At which point do you announce the mistake to a screen reader? Where do you shift focus? etc. It was designed this way for a specific reason. Services that feel the need to extend or change it do have the option to though.

g15jv2dp 2y ago
> There's so much research that shows the opposite. Care to link it? It should be easy to do, if there's so much of it.
IshKebab 2y ago
> At which point do you announce the mistake to a screen reader? There is a standard for this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Attributes/aria-invalid https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/A... But I would suggest just having the validation in addition to the current behaviour. > Where do you shift focus? You don't? > There's so much research that shows the opposite. There's research that shows that a "tomorrow" button is bad??
- petepete 2y ago
  > There's research that shows that a "tomorrow" button is bad?? That client side validation isn't always accessible. More info here: https://design-system.service.gov.uk/patterns/validation/ https://design-system.service.gov.uk/patterns/validation/
  - IshKebab 2y ago
    That page doesn't say that at all. In fact they even mention a character count component that gives instant feedback.
    - petepete 2y ago
      It does. > When to tell the user about validation errors > Do not validate when the user moves away from a field. Wait until they try to move to the next part of the service - usually by clicking the ‘continue’ or ‘submit’ button at the bottom of the page. Yeah the character count is a bit of a special case because reaching the limit without going over would be very inconvenient.

g15jv2dp 2y ago

> There's so much research that shows the opposite. Care to link it? It should be easy to do, if there's so much of it.

IshKebab 2y ago

> At which point do you announce the mistake to a screen reader? There is a standard for this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Attributes/aria-invalid https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/A... But I would suggest just having the validation in addition to the current behaviour. > Where do you shift focus? You don't? > There's so much research that shows the opposite. There's research that shows that a "tomorrow" button is bad??

petepete 2y ago
> There's research that shows that a "tomorrow" button is bad?? That client side validation isn't always accessible. More info here: https://design-system.service.gov.uk/patterns/validation/ https://design-system.service.gov.uk/patterns/validation/
- IshKebab 2y ago
  That page doesn't say that at all. In fact they even mention a character count component that gives instant feedback.
  - petepete 2y ago
    It does. > When to tell the user about validation errors > Do not validate when the user moves away from a field. Wait until they try to move to the next part of the service - usually by clicking the ‘continue’ or ‘submit’ button at the bottom of the page. Yeah the character count is a bit of a special case because reaching the limit without going over would be very inconvenient.