4 ms·
my understanding is that serenity will focus less on the web browser in the first place. it might just go back to being a simple html viewer with rudimentary js
by nasso_dev 2y ago
my understanding is that serenity will focus less on the web browser in the first place. it might just go back to being a simple html viewer with rudimentary js support?
my hope is that they take this as an opportunity to come up with a purpose built "web" stack for serenity? use it as an excuse to reinvent the web and "fix" the mistakes that were made? maybe by actually Putting Scheme In The Browser rather than js?
- robertlagrant 2y agoThey could put Scheme in the browser, but then what websites would work? How many have Scheme; zero? Have JS - almost all?
- 0xDEAFBEAD 2y agoI would argue WebAssembly is a better idea than Scheme.
- hazn 2y agoyou can have both! https://spritely.institute/hoot/ https://spritely.institute/hoot/