I didn't say her case was obvious. I said there are obviously two categories of types of conduct, one falling into a legal category and one falling into an ille

I didn't say her case was obvious. I said there are obviously two categories of types of conduct, one falling into a legal category and one falling into an illegal category. My observation is that much of the discussion here seems to not even acknowledge the reality that Right of Publicity laws exist and what they entail. That really has nothing to do with whether or not her case is good. Your response here seems to further my point, in that you completely run past that and instead debate the specifics (which we don't all know and aren't all privy to, and would be the disputed facts in any potential litigation).