4 ms·
I'm totally fine with subscription apps, but the price has to be reasonable. I'm not a video editor so I can't speak to that but here's one example: Most calo
by ClassyJacket 2y ago
I'm totally fine with subscription apps, but the price has to be reasonable.
I'm not a video editor so I can't speak to that but here's one example:
Most calorie counting apps want ~16AUD a month from me. That's what Disney+ costs and they spend billions of dollars making content. It's 3$ more than Spotify charges and they have almost every song ever made. It doesn't have to be free, or even a one-off cost, but it has to be reasonable. I'd pay 4$ for calorie counting features. 16? No.
- sundvor 2y agoYeah, thanks for reminding me - cancelling MyFitnessPal trial - it's 130 AUD for a year, way more on a monthly basis. There are some apps in this genre that are absolutely insane - $300 or so for an AI image analyser, which you have no way to try unless you sign up for a trial where you are committed to that amount unless you remember to cancel.
- yreg 2y agoI have an app and I'm trying to figure out the pricing. I’m offering a one-time in app purchase of life-time subscription. Currently it costs 6x the monthly subscription cost. I'm worried that makes it too expensive for a simple app, at the same time lowering it would make the monthly subscription less sensible. I'm curious if anyone has indie experience and thoughts regarding this.
- throw0101d 2y ago> I'm totally fine with subscription apps, but the price has to be reasonable. I'm fine with it if includes some monthly re-occurring service, like cloud storage/sync. I purchased YNAB4 and I ran it just fine on my desktop. But YNAB5 went to subscription, and it included things like syncing multiple devices (which of course needs servers, which cost), but I have no need for that, and so I did not move to it. I'd much prefer I pay some one-time fee, and if I want syncing I can subscribe to just that. I also understand that if I pay $x for Version Y, then if I want Version Z there may be an upgrade fee.
- ryandrake 2y ago> I'm fine with it if includes some monthly re-occurring service, like cloud storage/sync. What sucks is when the developer adds some recurring service to their software that I don't want, purely as an excuse to justify moving to subscription, and then no longer offers the software without the "service" for a one-time price. For most of the software I use, I specifically don't want to be tethered to some kind of online service, have to have a network connection to run it, and so on. And I'll actively look for the competing software that's a one-time cost and isn't Cloud-ified.
- domador 2y agoThis is a widespread and recurring problem when a software tool that should be a product gets artificially turned into a service.
- joshspankit 2y agoOne of my most-used apps is $2/yr and I’m very happy about it
- ErigmolCt 2y agoOne of mine is for $10/yr and is not too much but still... And do not have another choice
- ErigmolCt 2y agoAnd price is often do not come up with this criteria
- jessesbye 2y agoI recently discovered Lose It. The pricing is much more reasonable compared to other calorie counting apps - $10USD/year. There's also an option for lifetime purchase but I haven't used it long enough to justify locking in for that much time. The only annoying thing is you have to get the free app, wait a day or two and then it will offer you the discounted premium subscription.