4 ms·
That was fascinating So interesting the, only mentioned, fact: > Altman did not tell the board he owned the OpenAI startup fund. It was a non profit. That
by worik 2y ago
That was fascinating
So interesting the, only mentioned, fact:
> Altman did not tell the board he owned the OpenAI startup fund.
It was a non profit. That on its own, IMO, a firing offense
What a dreadfully dishonest human being
- dekhn 2y agoI wonder, if the board had explicitly said this (rather than their odd phrasing, "its board... concluded that Altman was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities") whether the firing would have stuck.
- throwcon 2y agoTypical sili(con) valley thing
- jl2718 2y agoCan you elaborate more on how this fund or the startups are connected to OpenAI money or technology, and how he profits from the association, aside from the name? Seems like there must be an evil genius plan behind all of this, but maybe I’m not fully grasping the whole thing.