3 ms·
The explanation for this is simple and has been true for decades: the major investors in utility corporations have huge holdings in fossil fuels. So if you own
by photochemsyn 2y ago
The explanation for this is simple and has been true for decades: the major investors in utility corporations have huge holdings in fossil fuels. So if you own the electric utility and are trading gas futures and hold many shares in gas producers, then a transition to solar - while good for the customers and for the utility's balance sheets - hurts the investor's other larger interests.
It's comparable to kerosene lamp manufacturers and kerosene producers trying to block rural electrification because people would use electric lights if they only could get access to them.
Of course, this is why the US government - whose politicians are little more than middle managers for the investment capitalism system - implemented huge tariffs on Chinese monocrystalline silicon PV panels.
- soco 2y agoNow if only some of those tariffs money would be used to promote the local production of solar cells...
- nradov 2y agoWhat an odd, off-topic comment. The utility companies in this article, Mohave Electric Cooperative (MEC) and Arizona Electric Power Cooperative (Aepco), aren't investor owned. Have you considered looking into what's actually happening instead of inventing imaginary conspiracies?