And where does this leave the current board? The CEO gave no mea culpa, and even if he did, actively thwarting board oversight is a clear no-no. How in the worl

And where does this leave the current board? The CEO gave no mea culpa, and even if he did, actively thwarting board oversight is a clear no-no. How in the world do they expect to perform their duties with a CEO who demonstrated himself to refuse to even provide them the information they need to discharge their duties? As long as they keep this CEO in a position to block their access to information, the board has no credibility.