2 ms·
This is burying the other end of the lede: the suit is about someone who died because the car caught fire and their door couldn't be opened. So it could be see
by BoorishBears 2y ago
This is burying the other end of the lede: the suit is about someone who died because the car caught fire and their door couldn't be opened.
So it could be seen as an engineering shortcoming, even though the cause was someone driving drunk
- seoulmetro 2y agoCan't we sue the people who ran safety tests and regulations on the car to let it get on the road like that? Or the onus is on Tesla and this was a freak accident (manufactured wrong) they should have caught after design?
- orwin 2y agoIn this case, my guess is that door openings aren't regulated (unlike security belts), so it's on Tesla to design their car the sane way.