5 ms·
(blog post author here) No in fact, it is so much worse! I do agree we should use IPv6, The ending of the blog post says as such :) > If we are going to star
by benjojo12 2y ago
(blog post author here)
No in fact, it is so much worse! I do agree we should use IPv6, The ending of the blog post says as such :)
> If we are going to start using address space that might not work for all users, it would be wise to pick the address space that we already have a considerable head start on getting accepted: IPv6.
- jcalvinowens 2y agoI'm yelling at the people doing this shit, not you :) Somehow it is getting more and more common. I stayed at a hotel last year that used 1.0.0.0/24 on its LAN (yes, '1' not '10', I couldn't believe it at first).
- ale42 2y agoThis was very common in the past. People abused 1.0.0.0/24 because it was unused. There was even one of the big ISPs in Italy assigning such addresses for their customers for CGNAT...
- sambazi 2y agodoes this fit in the greater 'enshittification' theme? subpar replacements w/o real alternatives