3 ms·
I worked in Area120 and then at Waymo, in the X building, and saw lots of the other X projects. They built some jaw-dropping stuff. It's tempting to talk about
by ddp26 2y ago
I worked in Area120 and then at Waymo, in the X building, and saw lots of the other X projects. They built some jaw-dropping stuff.
It's tempting to talk about structural problems, incentives, the dynamic between search ads & "moonshots".
But I think the main variable that explains the outcomes is quality of management. Running projects like these requires excellent leadership - giving brilliant engineers autonomy to experiment, yet guiding them towards a consistent goal. Knowing when to double down and when to pivot.
The stories about John Krafcik, Astro Teller, and Andy Conrad [https://www.statnews.com/2016/03/28/google-life-sciences-exodus/ https://www.statnews.com/2016/03/28/google-life-sciences-exo...], or what happened with Levandowski paint a picture that sufficiently explains the outcomes.
- jebarker 2y ago> yet guiding them towards a consistent goal You mean on a per project basis or as an overall strategy for the org?
- ddp26 2y agoBoth but here I meant per-project.
- adolph 2y agoThat Statnews article might be on the level, but it quotes Rob Enderle twice. If the name doesn’t ring a bell, here are some of his greatest hits: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Rob_Enderle https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Rob_Enderle