5 ms·
> No one wants email to work better than it does from a performance or function perspective. Hard disagree. Email sucks in just about every way.
by TylerE 2y ago
> No one wants email to work better than it does from a performance or function perspective.
Hard disagree. Email sucks in just about every way.
- citizenpaul 2y agoIt sucks and that is a killer feature. Get a few years on you and the Grind-set will fade as you realize you don't want the only thing in life to be work. You will be glad email still exists.
- nradov 2y agoWhat about it sucks? Seems fine to me as long as it's used as intended and not for other purposes.
- citizenpaul 2y agoI don't personally think it sucks. There are bike-shed levels of improvements that probably any person on HN could dream up to make it more effective and work more reliably.
- TylerE 2y agoWell, for a start, there is no way of knowing if a message I sent actually get delivered. Messages sometimes take minutes or even go up a to come through for no apparent reason what so ever. Massive spam issues. Headers are trivially forged People can sign up other peoples addresses to mailing lists, and if that 3rd party is a company, good luck not getting re-subscribed to random stuff for the rest of eternity.
- EvanAnderson 2y ago> Well, for a start, there is no way of knowing if a message I sent actually get delivered. That's a feature. I don't want senders to know if their message was received without my explicit acknowledgement.
- oneshtein 2y ago> Well, for a start, there is no way of knowing if a message I sent actually get delivered. There is, but nobody uses it. > Massive spam issues. Verify your recipients, then add them to a white list, then block everybody else, like a typical chat program does.
- swiftcoder 2y ago> Well, for a start, there is no way of knowing if a message I sent actually get delivered. Every major email client has supported read receipts for a very long time now. It's just rarely enabled by default outside of corporate environments (I would guess in part because users find it invasive).
- dzhiurgis 2y agoThe only purpose it has for me for last decade is bills, invoices and all sort of similar transactional spam crap.
- TylerE 2y agoPrecisely. All actual communication (family, friends, etc) has moved to text, facebook messenger, etc, in large part because of how crappy email is/has gotten.
- swiftcoder 2y ago> large part because of how crappy email is/has gotten The funny bit here is that email itself hasn't actually changed at all (at least not in ways that affect personal communication). It's just that folks have become used to the intrusive instant gratification of push-based chat systems.
- nvy 2y agoOnly for spammers trying to get their marketing into my inbox. For personal use cases email is great.
- lxgr 2y agoEmail sucks, sure. But it sucks less than any of these alternatives: - Corporate support chats (no way to export/capture a papertrail as a customer, usually horribly brittle) - Proprietary/company-specific messaging solutions in my account on various sites (no notification channel for responses, often no papertrail for me either) - Contact forms (unidirectional, not standardized, no papertrail for me as a sender) - Push notifications (single-device only, no reasonable inbox management, headline-only) - SMS (just no on so many levels, most importantly that I don't want everything to be tied to my phone/phone plan and that I can't own my phone number in the same way that I can own a TLD) The EU (or Germany, I still haven't found out) mandates companies to have a support email address, and it's just so much more pleasant than the US pattern of providing only phone support, a horrible support chat experience, or a mailing address.
- karaterobot 2y agoThe person you're responding to is saying that email sucking is a feature for the user, preventing them from being always at work. That making email like Slack would make it less appealing, and that's why nobody wants to replace it with something quote unquote better.