7 ms·
The term they googled makes it clear they fully knew they weren't doing something clean. I totally see what they did wrong and here's the proof they knew too:
by TacticalCoder 2y ago
The term they googled makes it clear they fully knew they weren't doing something clean.
I totally see what they did wrong and here's the proof they knew too:
> "allegedly “searched online for, among other things, ‘money laundering,’ ‘exploit,’ ‘computer fraud abuse act,’5 and ‘does the united states extradite to [foreign country]."
But you may be seeing different things than others, including the perpetrators of this crime.
- OutOfHere 2y agoAll those web search terms are relevant for indirectly helping find useful defense attorneys. If doesn't in itself demonstrate any guilt. I am not saying they're not guilty of fraud, only that a jury needs to be massively more objective than look to such searches as evidence of guilt. Also, there are probably thousands of people who do the same searches without participating in any fraud.
- unyttigfjelltol 2y agoSince when would it even be admissible at trial to seek to obtain the advice of an attorney? The fact the DOJ put that in a press release shows they're grasping at straws.
- morbicer 2y agoAs far as I know googling isn't illegal. As someone working in security I search for all kind of things. Doesn't mean I am doing them.