4 ms·
Yesterday painted them as literal Gods, instead of just decent musicians at the right place at the right time. To this day I go out of my way to ward people aw
by tetris11 2y ago
Yesterday painted them as literal Gods, instead of just decent musicians at the right place at the right time.
To this day I go out of my way to ward people away from that terrible film.
- vips7L 2y agoI thought that movie was fun for what it was.
- arnavpraneet 2y agoDid we watch the same movie? It was more about their cultural impact than painting them as gods
- tetris11 2y agoImagine you have a friend who plays a nice song for you, and is dumfounded -nay- awestruck to the point of murder - that you aren't moved to tears by the performance because he believes the song was written by the angels themselves. That movie overglorified the Beatles beyond credibility, and it was genuinely painful to watch.
- sharma-arjun 2y agoI think the dumbfoundedness didn't arise from the inherent quality of the music, but his shock at the fact that five people in England didn't know who the Beatles were. That said, I do think this movie missed out on a lot of potential, by not exploring what the actual significance of the Beatles to the world would have been: it never really asks what the world would be like had the Beatles never existed, which I think is a really interesting question, and instead develop a typical Hollywood plot.
- tetris11 2y agoI did find the lack of cigarettes amusing, so I'm guessing the parallel world really had nothing to do with the Beatles at all, they were just a byproduct
- anonymfus 2y agoThe premise of these realities being almost identical means that they had no cultural impact.