2 ms·
That's fine, I've never seen one of them, I wasn't making a judgement on that. I said 'I think you could certainly have a product [...]'. Any porous material wo
by OJFord 2y ago
That's fine, I've never seen one of them, I wasn't making a judgement on that. I said 'I think you could certainly have a product [...]'. Any porous material would be a lot more resistant to rain than the wet towel, for example.
- Dylan16807 2y ago> 'sort of' and 'very shallow', I said. Yes, but you also said it was more than rainfall. A towel is so overly shallow that it becomes less than rain. > Any porous material would be a lot more resistant to rain than the wet towel, for example. That doesn't sound right to me. Rain will stick around in spots, and those spots will be wetter than under a towel.
- OJFord 2y agoNo I did not. I said it's different.
- Dylan16807 2y agoIf it's different in a way that is never more than rain, then how could it cause a problem? It has to be more in some way for your argument to make logical sense. Or was I unclear that I meant "more in some situations than rain ever is". If that's it, then sorry, my bad.