3 ms·
Also critically they don’t have to build these coal plant to be economically used in the same way as free market states do. They’re building them mostly as a he
by dalyons 2y ago
Also critically they don’t have to build these coal plant to be economically used in the same way as free market states do. They’re building them mostly as a hedge - if they end up barely used , which is likely given renewable trends, that’s ok for state owned power. It makes everything a bit more expensive, but you can’t exactly vote for an alternative.
If they need to get used a lot for whatever reason, no one is unhappy either, you avoid shortages and discontent.
Whereas coal stopped being built in market economies roughly as soon as it became uneconomical.
- soperj 2y agoHow do you vote for an alternative in the US?
- dalyons 2y agoIf a state gov made choices that made power way more expensive than it should be, and people get upset enough it theoretically could hurt them in an election. I realize this hasn’t happened in California but it’s possible
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]