4 ms·
oh fair enough about the "user" vs possession. but my point was they could possible use this info to get a warrant to surveil you to catch you using it.
by denimnerd42 2y ago
oh fair enough about the "user" vs possession. but my point was they could possible use this info to get a warrant to surveil you to catch you using it.
- beaeglebeachh 2y agoThey don't need that. I was served a federal search warrant after a detective wrote an anonymous officer claimed an anonymous DOG accused me of wrongdoing. When 3rd order anonymous interspecies hearsay is sufficient for a warrant it means a warrant is just a rubber stamp.
- denimnerd42 2y agofair. its not hard to get a warrant. but your info in the database could still make you a target
- vkou 2y agoEven a rubber-stamp warrant process serves a point, by making the police identify who they are targeting, as opposed to targeting everyone, and deciding who to charge after the fact. Warrants aren't supposed to be hard to get. They are only supposed to stop the most blatant fishing expeditions.