4 ms·

It did actually happen. Maybe read far enough to justify the snark

by mslt 2y ago

ngvrnd 2y ago
what were the conclusions? I skimmed it but did not see any.
refulgentis 2y ago
(not the poster you're chastising) I read for 5-7 minutes because I thought I might be missing it, couldn't find it. Help an ADHDer out? Edit: you sure? Now I read the PDF and reviewer comments too...fyi I'm on mobile. Only thing left i can think of that'd hide it.
alwa 2y ago
I’m surprised they were able to run the study so quickly, what with this study protocol only being published in December of last year. Although I may well be confused about the long timelines between things getting done and things making it into print in this field. Do you have a link to the study’s results? It reads to me like a sane and effective design, and I’d really be curious how it panned out. Maybe the main link can be updated to refer to the completed study.
WhiteDawn 2y ago
Citation needed? The study concluded in Sept 2023 but no results were provided. Are results on these studies usually so delayed? Perhaps they didn’t get the expected result?
- refulgentis 2y ago
  Calling it here: mslt, to apologize, you should say "I'm sorry, I didn't read far enough to justify my own snark. That's who screwed up here. I apologize to the poster I lashed out at"
- jzebedee 2y ago
  The study did run and conclude: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696
  - dvfjsdhgfv 2y ago
    Could you tell us what the conclusion was? Because this is the very point of this discussion.
    - CoastalCoder 2y ago
      IIUC, the data have been gathered but the results aren't yet published: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696?tab=results https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696?tab=results I think we're confused because it's a strange stage for bringing the study to our attention.
- IanCal 2y ago
  A few months isn't a long delay for a paper to be published.
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
Terr_ 2y ago
The study may have happened since this was first written, but AFAICT the results are still absent, so it's still not newsworthy because there's no real news.

It did actually happen. Maybe read far enough to justify the snark

by mslt 2y ago

It did actually happen. Maybe read far enough to justify the snark

ngvrnd 2y ago

what were the conclusions? I skimmed it but did not see any.

refulgentis 2y ago

(not the poster you're chastising) I read for 5-7 minutes because I thought I might be missing it, couldn't find it. Help an ADHDer out? Edit: you sure? Now I read the PDF and reviewer comments too...fyi I'm on mobile. Only thing left i can think of that'd hide it.

alwa 2y ago

I’m surprised they were able to run the study so quickly, what with this study protocol only being published in December of last year. Although I may well be confused about the long timelines between things getting done and things making it into print in this field. Do you have a link to the study’s results? It reads to me like a sane and effective design, and I’d really be curious how it panned out. Maybe the main link can be updated to refer to the completed study.

WhiteDawn 2y ago

Citation needed? The study concluded in Sept 2023 but no results were provided. Are results on these studies usually so delayed? Perhaps they didn’t get the expected result?

refulgentis 2y ago
Calling it here: mslt, to apologize, you should say "I'm sorry, I didn't read far enough to justify my own snark. That's who screwed up here. I apologize to the poster I lashed out at"
jzebedee 2y ago
The study did run and conclude: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696
- dvfjsdhgfv 2y ago
  Could you tell us what the conclusion was? Because this is the very point of this discussion.
  - CoastalCoder 2y ago
    IIUC, the data have been gathered but the results aren't yet published: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696?tab=results https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05155696?tab=results I think we're confused because it's a strange stage for bringing the study to our attention.
IanCal 2y ago
A few months isn't a long delay for a paper to be published.

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

Terr_ 2y ago

The study may have happened since this was first written, but AFAICT the results are still absent, so it's still not newsworthy because there's no real news.