4 ms·
Even though it's well intended, I feel like pasting in responses from ChatGPT should be against HN guidelines, if it's not yet. Reason is, if I want that type o
by radarsat1 2y ago
Even though it's well intended, I feel like pasting in responses from ChatGPT should be against HN guidelines, if it's not yet. Reason is, if I want that type of explanation, I can go and get it myself. I come here for people's personal comments, not to read them regurgitate what they had an LLM generate. And I use ChatGPT all the time so don't get me wrong, I just think it doesn't add a lot to the discussion here and takes up a lot of room.
- Terr_ 2y agoI'm torn on this, because I don't want to have LLM stuff gunking everything up either, but I think there's a general case to be made for comments like: "For anyone who is confused about X like I was, I found this explanation." In other words, how would one exclude LLM regurgitation but permit Wikipedia quotes?
- amelius 2y agoAsk the LLM to cite a source, then use that.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- robswc 2y agoI agree on principal and instinct... but then I realize how often people add quotes from Wikipedia or 1st or 2nd results from a google search. Maybe most of the bad vibe comes from the "wall of text" and "tone" ChatGPT outputs.
- radarsat1 2y agoAgreed.