3 ms·
It shouldn't in general, but there are restricted cases where it's literally life and death and difficult/impossible to plan around.
by kadoban 3y ago
It shouldn't in general, but there are restricted cases where it's literally life and death and difficult/impossible to plan around.
- bennyhill 3y agoI don't see how a work around for an intentional shortage can be acceptable if you are saying the AMA kills people and I think that you are.
- kadoban 3y ago> for an intentional shortage I would not say it's only acceptable for unintended shortages, or maybe very brief and rare shortages since those tend to be the kind you can't reasonably plan around. As for saying the AMA kills people, not sure I'd go that far without doing more research. But I wouldn't be at all surprised if the effect of some of their policies is more deaths than there otherwise would be.
- kadoban 3y agoUgh, I meant to say it's only acceptaple for unintended shortages. An extra "not" snuck in there.