4 ms·

Well that's ok, I guess they don't have to report on it anymore.

• mynameisvlad 2y ago
  The bar set by GP comment is that the BBC “ignored this”. Any amount of coverage proves that to not be the case. Have they reported on it enough? No. But that’s not what was being claimed.
  • lupusreal 2y ago
    That claim was preceded by the language "hardly covered this". You're being uncharitably literal.
    • ruszki 2y ago
      Fascists are gaining power because people are allowed to be not literal enough, and they are allowed to use dog whistles and euphemism.
      • Gud 2y ago
        Sorry, I don’t understand what you are saying. Are you claiming that the person criticising the UK state media is a fascist? Or are you saying that the state media not covering these law changes adequately make them fascist?
        • ruszki 2y ago
          None of those.
          • Gud 2y ago
            Ok, would you clarify for me?
  • deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  • slackfan 2y ago
    Soviet media hardly covered Soviet labor camps, but it absolutely covered them!!11
    • mynameisvlad 2y ago
      Maybe next time, GP should be more precise with their words when they make two statements in one comment so low quality replies like these don’t have to exist.
• Supermancho 2y ago
  Hey it's mentioned here on HN. That counts as being reported!?