3 ms·
Counterpoint: The MVP is usually what ends up in production. If your code is a heap of garbage but chocolate-coated on the outside, you're gonna impress managem
by megadog3 2y ago
Counterpoint: The MVP is usually what ends up in production. If your code is a heap of garbage but chocolate-coated on the outside, you're gonna impress management and they'll want to push it live asap. Then the issues start exploding.
- cranberryturkey 2y agoyes, a shitty foundation leads to shitty feature implementation. I've seen this everywhere from startups to Fortune 500 companies. Nobody cares about code quality, except maybe the one self-annointed gatekeeper who thinks he's making a difference and shitting on everyone's PRs delaying features. Get rid of that guy he serves no purpose
- vbezhenar 2y agoThat guy keeps everything from collapsing.
- jampekka 2y agoYeah, if the indentation style, variable name capitalization rules, structure of commits, 100% unit test coverage the guy knows is the absolute truth and top priority, a collapse of everything is imminent.
- sambazi 2y agoinvolved conservationists and curators rarely get the recognition they deserve, but sometimes obstructionists are just that
- tkdev2 2y agoSpoken like a true MBA. Hope I never have to work with you.
- fireflash38 2y agoPeople don't care about quality in general unless it affects the bottom line. Not just code quality, but product too. Bugs? Who cares unless it costs us money. Security holes? only a problem if they're exploited... And it costs us money.
- fuzzy2 2y agoUm, yeah, that's… IMHO exactly where an MVP is supposed to end up. The “VP” says that.