3 ms·
Or worse, multiple faster than algaes and sucking up all the Nitrogen from thr air.
by egberts1 3y ago
Or worse, multiple faster than algaes and sucking up all the Nitrogen from thr air.
- yxhuvud 3y agoDo you realise 70% of the atmosphere is nitrogen? We will not run out of it.
- agos 3y agomake that 78%
- __MatrixMan__ 3y agoRemoving the nitrogen bottleneck would let them capture carbon faster. Given our predicament I'd say we should take all the help we get.
- gjytfhbfd 3y agoRemove too much carbon however and the plants die. We don't want a Great Decarbonification Event.
- __MatrixMan__ 3y agoDecaying plants emit carbon. The extra nitrogen would just be changing is the length of the give-your-carbon-back-to-the-atmosphere queue. It's negative feedback: stable.
- adastra22 3y agoNitrogen is inert. Even if you could run out of N2 (unlikely), it would have no effect.
- gitanovic 3y agoThat's wrong, the fact that is inert doesn't mean it's useless If you remove all nitrogen from atmosphere, there WILL be consequences
- gjytfhbfd 3y agoCurrent planes will not be able to fly since they will lose 70% of lift. They will grow gigantic wings.
- gibolt 3y agoThere'd be less drag on rockets too. That could be a plus for when we need to escape the death spiral we create
- adastra22 3y agoThe sibling comment about lift is one of the few things I can think of. Birds would have a tough time. The freezing point of water would also be lowered significantly. Eliminating a gas while keeping all other partial pressures constant only affects physical processes. Biochemistry on the other hand only relies on partial pressures, and the number of organisms which interact with atmospheric nitrogen are literally so few that you could count them on one hand. This is all pretty far afield though. There's no way biological processes are even going to have a dent in the ocean of N2 surrounding us.
- bonzini 3y agoExcept burning your lungs in the not-so-long run, as they are not evolved to deal with a pure oxygen atmosphere.
- pfdietz 3y agoA photosynthetic organism that fixed more nitrogen than it needed would (1) be at a terrible competitive disadvantage (nitrogen fixation requires a great deal of energy), and (2) would be a source of fixed nitrogen when it died, boosting the growth of other plants that could leech off its efforts.