> I don't like how these papers boast their own methods by poorly implementing a baseline and describing their own methods using lots of mathematical jargon Th

> I don't like how these papers boast their own methods by poorly implementing a baseline and describing their own methods using lots of mathematical jargon This is a dogwhistle for bad papers - the denser and more incomprehensible they are, the more you can be sure the authors are hiding bad science in there.