5 ms·
And they even allow you to use it without logging in. Didnt expect that from Meta.
by nickthegreek 3y ago
And they even allow you to use it without logging in. Didnt expect that from Meta.
- lairv 3y agoNot in the EU though
- sega_sai 3y agoor the UK
- salil999 3y agoI do see on the bottom left: Log in to save your conversation history, sync with Messenger, generate images and more.
- zitterbewegung 3y agoThink they meant it can be used without login.
- applecrazy 3y agoI imagine that is to compete with ChatGPT, which began doing the same.
- visarga 3y agoDoesn't work for me, I'm in EU.
- mvkel 3y agoProbably bc they're violating gdpr
- HarHarVeryFunny 3y agoYeah, but not for image generation unfortunately I've never had a FaceBook account, and really don't trust them regarding privacy
- zingelshuher 3y agohad to upvote this
- sdesol 3y agoI had the same reaction, but when I saw the thumbs up and down icon, I realized this was a smart way to crowd source validation data.
- unshavedyak 3y agoWhich indicates that they get enough value out of logged ~in~ out users. Potentially they can identify you without logging in, no need to. But also ofc they get a lot of value by giving them data via interacting with the model.
- hakdbha 3y ago[dead]
- MichaelCharles 3y agoBut not from Japan, and I assume most other non-English speaking countries.
- mvkel 3y ago1. Free rlhf 2. They cookie the hell out of you to breadcrumb your journey around the web. They don't need you to login to get what they need, much like Google
- eggdaft 3y agoDo they really need “free RLHF”? As I understand it, RLHF needs relatively little data to work and its quality matters - I would expect paid and trained labellers to do a much better job than Joey Keyboard clicking past a “which helped you more” prompt whilst trying to generate an email.
- spi 3y agoVariety matters a lot. If you pay 1000 trained labellers, you get 1000 POVs for a good amount of money, and likely can't even think of 1000 good questions to have them ask. If you let 1000000 people give you feedback on random topics for free, and then pay 100 trained people to go through all of that and only retain the most useful 1%, you get much ten times more variety for a tenth of the cost. Of course numbers are pretty random, but it's just to give an idea of how these things scale. This is my experience from my company's own internal -deep learning but not LLM- models to train which we had to buy data instead of collecting it. If you can't tap into data "from the wild" -in our case, for legal reason- you can still get enough data (if measured in GB), but it's depressingly more repetitive, and that's not quite the same thing when you want to generalize.
- mvkel 3y agoAbsolutely. Modern captchas are self driving object labelers; you just need a few to "agree" to know what the right answer is.
- dizhn 3y agoWe should agree on a different answer for crosswalk and traffic light and mess it up for them.
- yakorevivan 3y ago