4 ms·

Regardless of your opinion of the Daily Wire, they have an in-depth article with details that the Washington Post omitted. With hyperlinks to each source: http

Regardless of your opinion of the Daily Wire, they have an in-depth article with details that the Washington Post omitted. With hyperlinks to each source: https://www.dailywire.com/news/google-employees-occupy-office-of-boss-until-contract-with-israel-is-dropped https://www.dailywire.com/news/google-employees-occupy-offic...

m1n7 3y ago
doesn't matter how "in-depth" it is, it's still the daily wire and not trustworthy
- anon291 3y ago
  The only bipartisanship today seems to be the substitution of curiosity for tribalism
  - m1n7 3y ago
    bipartisanship between who?
- arrowsmith 3y ago
  Maybe not, but the DW article includes more photos and video than the WP article, it provides a copy of the original employee letter + list of demands, and it also embeds some tweets from one of the protest's organisers. You can form your opinion from the primary sources.
- uejfiweun 3y ago
  All sources have at least a small element of truth to them... it's better to get as many sides as you can and come up with your own conclusion, rather than completely block off certain opinions.
  - m1n7 3y ago
    that's only true as long as you have media that at least tries to inform the public with good journalism. the dw is a fascist publication that only cares about making money off people with misdirected anger by spreading hate. it has no value.
arrowsmith 3y ago
Why is everybody in every photo still wearing masks in 2024? Are there seriously still places where this is considered normal?
- mrtesthah 3y ago
  it reduces the risk of doxxing.
- feverzsj 3y ago
  Maybe they thought hr won't recognize them and they can go back to work like nothing happened.
- greyface- 3y ago
  I assume it is to decrease the risk of contracting COVID, which continues to circulate in 2024.
- ronhav3 3y ago
  They are cowards who are afraid to put a name to their noble cause
- int_19h 3y ago
  Are there any places where it's not? Sure, it's not mandatory anymore, but why are you objecting to people voluntarily taking measures to prevent getting infected? COVID is still around, and it's not the only thing that can have dire health consequences.

m1n7 3y ago

doesn't matter how "in-depth" it is, it's still the daily wire and not trustworthy

anon291 3y ago
The only bipartisanship today seems to be the substitution of curiosity for tribalism
- m1n7 3y ago
  bipartisanship between who?
arrowsmith 3y ago
Maybe not, but the DW article includes more photos and video than the WP article, it provides a copy of the original employee letter + list of demands, and it also embeds some tweets from one of the protest's organisers. You can form your opinion from the primary sources.
uejfiweun 3y ago
All sources have at least a small element of truth to them... it's better to get as many sides as you can and come up with your own conclusion, rather than completely block off certain opinions.
- m1n7 3y ago
  that's only true as long as you have media that at least tries to inform the public with good journalism. the dw is a fascist publication that only cares about making money off people with misdirected anger by spreading hate. it has no value.

arrowsmith 3y ago

Why is everybody in every photo still wearing masks in 2024? Are there seriously still places where this is considered normal?

mrtesthah 3y ago
it reduces the risk of doxxing.
feverzsj 3y ago
Maybe they thought hr won't recognize them and they can go back to work like nothing happened.
greyface- 3y ago
I assume it is to decrease the risk of contracting COVID, which continues to circulate in 2024.
ronhav3 3y ago
They are cowards who are afraid to put a name to their noble cause
int_19h 3y ago
Are there any places where it's not? Sure, it's not mandatory anymore, but why are you objecting to people voluntarily taking measures to prevent getting infected? COVID is still around, and it's not the only thing that can have dire health consequences.