6 ms·
Firefox Proton UI userChrome.css fixes. (2021)
- Ygg2 3y agoAmazing. I'm using it daily.
- amanzi 3y agoThe main reason I've been using this is to make my tabs look like tabs again, and not floating buttons.
- torstenvl 3y agoThat bothers me too. But my fix doesn't have as many stars :) https://github.com/torstenvl/userChrome.css https://github.com/torstenvl/userChrome.css
- tbolt 3y agoI’ll give this a shot. The “new” tabs are awful
- EspadaV9 3y agoI'd just like a nice, one click option, to completely remove the tabs. I make use of Tree Style Tab extension and just want the top bar gone.
- quesera 3y agoIt's well more than one click, but only takes about 60 seconds to remove the top horizontal tab bar: https://superuser.com/questions/1424478/can-i-hide-native-tabs-at-the-top-of-firefox https://superuser.com/questions/1424478/can-i-hide-native-ta...
- EspadaV9 3y agoHave been meaning to check something like this out again after an OS reinstall. I've had hit and miss success with some of these before, but it is handy at these workarounds are available.
- ewen-lbh 3y agodamn i stumbled upon this it reminded me of how long it has been since i committed to https://github.com/ewen-lbh/ffcss https://github.com/ewen-lbh/ffcss lmao pretty sure it's broken, maybe i should revive it?
- djbusby 3y agoOr pair up with one of the other tools. Sum greater than parts and all that.
- acomagu 3y agoTry Floorp. It's folk of Firefox, just like Vivaldi/Edge in Chrome. It supports switching the look and do things like this repository does.
- MrAlex94 3y agoIsn’t it going through some controversy of its own at the moment? I understand they want to “source available” rather than keep open source features they’ve developed, because others are forking their work. The irony being not only are they a fork, their initial feature set was from existing add-ons that they were just downloading/installing by default.
- Macha 3y agoI genuinely don't understand the appeal of a closed Firefox fork. At that point why not just use Vivaldi? Anyway, after googling the issue, the running of that browser is a bit too amateur hour for me to rely on for something as sensitive as a web browser, even if they have reversed course on the decision.
- aquova 3y agoI've never used their actual project, but I really like the article they wrote covering Firefox UI changes over time (you can find it under the wiki pages of the repo) - https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix/wiki/%5BArticle%5D-0.-Firefox-UI-UX-history https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix/wiki/%5BArticle%... Mozilla has made significant UI changes every 3-4 years, with the last one being in 2021. Perhaps we're about due to see another?
- djbusby 3y agoI hope not. UI fiddling is what you do when out of ideas. Mozzarella has so much potential I don't want to see it wasted (again).
- staplers 3y agoUI fiddling is what you do when out of ideas. I would expect no less from a developer forum.
- aquova 3y agoWere they out of ideas in 2011, 2014, 2017, 2021?
- thayne 3y agoIn my experience, UI fiddling happens when the design team decides everything needs an overhaul, and the developers would rather fix bugs and add features. And I suspect designers like to redesign everything for the same reasons that developers prefer to implement new shiny features.
- hulitu 3y ago> he developers would rather fix bugs and add features From my experience (as a user) these two contradict each other. (see Google and Microsoft products for examples).
- no_time 3y agoPhoton my beloved. No redesign felt so "right" upon first sight before or after it. No excess padding, timeless colors. You can feel the seething rage of current Mozilla designers for us wanting to turn off "grandparent mode" esque proportions when you see that the "compact" density is the only one that says "not supported" next to it, meanwhile the even more hilariously oversized Touch setting is totally ok.
- joe_guy 3y agoFirefox has had an issue open for years that it's trivial for a website to create invisible tabs. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1749835 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1749835
- djbusby 3y agoSeems a quick fix could be on empty title use hostname? Maybe a min-width on tabs would solve?
- jfk13 3y agoIt already did that for an empty title; the issue was with a title that was not empty, but contained only invisible Unicode characters (there are a number of such -- Unicode is very extensive and flexible). (Min-width is also already present, but doesn't ensure the tab is visible when inactive/unhovered if it has neither a visible icon or title; it'll just be some blank space in the tab bar.) As it happens, a patch is just landing that will handle more cases of "invisible but non-empty" titles, so that change should appear in a couple of months or so once it works through the release channels.
- Tmpod 3y agoThis is a great project! Once you use it, it's hard to go back, you'll miss a lot of these fixes.
- cbarrick 3y agoProton is what made me ditch Firefox. I don't want my screen real estate taken up by bigger and bigger toolbars, which was exactly one of the motivating reasons Firefox evolved its UI back in v4, circa 2011 [1]. I went to Vivaldi. It has tons of customization options, like classic Opera. [1]: https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix/wiki/%5BArticle%5D-0.-Firefox-UI-UX-history https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix/wiki/%5BArticle%...
- abdullahkhalids 3y agoUse sidebar tabs. Most websites don't use the full width of your screen. So, it makes total sense to put tabs in the sidebar, instead of them taking up valuable vertical screen state.
- Groxx 3y agosidebar tabs are so great. more horizontal space for the title, reduces tons of whitespace in 99% of sites, hierarchical collapsing in many (ya like tab groups? tree-style-tabs users have had them for a decade already), and it's easy to make them use little vertical space. it's such a no-brainer, I'm surprised it's not a first-class feature in the main browsers (I'm aware that it is built in or default in a number of niche browsers).
- trifurcate 3y agoEdge has this implemented in a pretty decent way.
- jorvi 3y agoBrave as well.
- weberer 3y ago>it's such a no-brainer, I'm surprised it's not a first-class feature in the main browsers Its one of those things like dark mode, where power users strongly request it for decades, yet corporations push back against it every time. And much the same as dark mode, I predict that all the same corporations will suddenly have a change of heart the second Apple starts implementing it.
- kayson 3y agoThere are a ton of other userChrome fix repos. I've gotten rid of my tab bar entirely and replaced it with a sidebar addon. Unfortunately my css seems to break with every other Firefox release. I really wish Firefox would make the UI more stable and make user chrome mods some kind of plugin system where I can pick and choose how to deeply customize the interface.
- remram 3y agoReally? I removed my tab bar years ago (I use Tree Style Tabs) and never had to tweak my userChrome.css once.
- erinnh 3y agoI remember it breaking exactly once. Last year they changed the syntax. But before that it was running fine for 3 or so.
- hackmiester 3y agoOh no! I am on ESR, so I guess I haven't gotten this change yet. How did you fix it?
- erinnh 3y agoHere is the change (as reflected in the sidebery wiki): https://github.com/mbnuqw/sidebery/wiki/Firefox-Styles-Snippets-(via-userChrome.css)/_compare/054af0ab73e36be59e9159ecad210bafcc6fa481...675f12cab4bfb70113b18727c9e63d184644e2d9 https://github.com/mbnuqw/sidebery/wiki/Firefox-Styles-Snipp... It was Firefox version 113 that changed it.
- imiric 3y ago> I really wish Firefox would make the UI more stable and make user chrome mods some kind of plugin system where I can pick and choose how to deeply customize the interface. Firefox extensions before Mozilla decided to kill XUL had the capability to radically alter the UI. This is what made FF extensions so powerful. There were arguably good reasons for them to remove XUL[1], but it created a void of functionality that previously existed. I still think that a more secure version of XUL could offer a better user experience, but unfortunately we're forced to settle on the severely limited WebExtensions standard nobody is happy with except browser developers. [1]: https://yoric.github.io/post/why-did-mozilla-remove-xul-addons/ https://yoric.github.io/post/why-did-mozilla-remove-xul-addo...
- yborg 3y agoAs noted, there are quite a few of these, I use this project: https://github.com/Aris-t2/CustomCSSforFx https://github.com/Aris-t2/CustomCSSforFx. It's actively maintained and lets me put the tab bar directly above the content but you can set it up to fully return you to the days of Firefox 4 if you want...
- Helmut10001 3y agoI wish there was a working userChrome.css fix for "Close all tabs to the right" to appear at the top-level right click, not nested in a submenu. I don't understand the decision by Mozilla and the argument that this is only needed by pro-users. Chrome has it at the top-level, too.
- Dylan16807 3y agoHow often do you use that option?
- Helmut10001 3y agoMultiple times daily. Whenever I end up with enough tabs so that they fill up the horizontal space of my monitor (e.g. 25), I move the relevant ones to the left and click "close all to the right" from some tab onward.
- bee_rider 3y agoThe userChrome system seems to change a little bit too often. Or maybe I’m just using it wrong. A couple time I’ve set my tabs so that they’ll show up in the same bar as the URL bar. This let me get down to one bar. It was wonderful but it only ever seems to last one update before breaking for some reason. Very annoying, especially coming from the one group that usually doesn’t think they know more about your computer should look than you do.
- lopis 3y agoUnfortunately Mozilla has said that userChrome is explicitly deprecated, with no plan to support it fully, but also no plan to remove the functionality. It's honestly one of my favourite features of Firefox which I've used for more than 10 years... I will be heart broken if they ever remove it.
- bee_rider 3y agoIt would be really annoying to look for a new browser, because most of them are chrome based at this point, but that’d do it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- 10729287 3y agoDefinitely a must once you install it. I love the improved usability and readability. Thank you author for making my browsing more pleasant !
- kuschkufan 3y agoIn the beginning Firefox was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and was widely regarded as a bad move.
- vsnf 3y agoWhat gets me is how every minor quirk or fault of FF makes people, despite knowing of and ostensibly being against the chrome monopoly, throw their hands up and declare that they need to go back to chrome.
- maleldil 3y agoIt surprises me how many people here can be extremely critical of Firefox/Mozilla and claim that Chrome-based browsers are better when they're _so much worse_. I'm not saying that Mozilla is infallible - they're definitely not - but for all their questionable decisions, they're still the best player in the browser market and the only one fighting for the free web. Do I wish Mozilla were better at managing Firefox? Of course. Is their lacklustre management enough for me to change to Google's almost monopoly? Hell no.
- slow_numbnut 3y agoProof, meet pudding: https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/browser_privacy.pdf https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/browser_privacy.pdf Mozilla hasn't been a contender for, let alone are, the best player in the browser market for a long time. They often willingly trade their users' best interests with abject nonsense and gaslight them when they complain. I know this might be an extreme position to take, but if Mozilla truly wanted the best for internet users, it should dissolve and deprecate their browser. Their death would leave behind a large clearing for other projects that actually put their users first. I use Brave now and I hate it, but at least they seem to actually care about my privacy.
- beretguy 3y agoCheck out librewolf - Firefox with with all “spy” stuff disabled https://librewolf.net/ https://librewolf.net/
- thrdbndndn 3y agoCan you make nested menu hover-to-expand-able again in Firefox (instead of having to click)? This is the change I hate most and I still can't get used to it (due to the fact no other software on my computer does this).
- xx_ns 3y agoI'm using this project (have for a long while) and nested menus open when hovered over in the menu that opens when right clicking on the page. Nested menus in the burger menu (top right) still need to be clicked on.
- Croftengea 3y agoWhen FF released Proton (which seemed to prefer visual candy over function) I switched to Waterfox. Never looked back.
- butz 3y agoWith all faults accounted for, I still have to give hats off to Firefox for having user customizable UI. Are there any other software applications out there providing customization features? Not many.
- beretguy 3y agoFirefox needs to copy Vivaldi features and then it will become the best browser on the market. Or maybe Vivaldi could develop a browser based on Firefox.