5 ms·

1. Open paper 2. Find GitHub 3. Read Source https://github.com/XuezheMax/megalodon https://github.com/XuezheMax/megalodon Dead link I have stoped reading th

1. Open paper 2. Find GitHub 3. Read Source https://github.com/XuezheMax/megalodon https://github.com/XuezheMax/megalodon Dead link I have stoped reading the papers, I only care about working code that can be used. Arvix LLM papers have reached the level of academic mastrubation in general. Fix the bad link and then we have something to talk about.

abathur 3y ago
Looks like probably https://github.com/dumpmemory/megalodon https://github.com/dumpmemory/megalodon
- bitvoid 3y ago
  I think that is a fork before the actual repo was made private. XuezheMax's GitHub profile shows that his contributions in April were all to private repositories.
  - abathur 3y ago
    Seems like a reasonable reading. It's only got 3 commits and 2 are from 18 hours ago--one of which fiddled the repo-made-public date and added the arxiv link--so perhaps there's a private working repo and they decided to make a ~clean public repo at the last minute (i.e., maybe the authors are self-conscious about the commit log).
  - dartos 3y ago
    I wonder what happened
  - elvircrn 3y ago
    Perhaps it was made private as part of a conference submission process?
    - amitport 3y ago
      Unlikely. Having code somewhere is OK, you just don't refer to it in the submitted version.
    - maleldil 3y ago
      If you link to a private repository, your GitHub profile can still be seen, which violates anonymity.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
lumost 3y ago
This happened to WizardLM2 yesterday as well https://wizardlm.github.io/WizardLM2/ https://wizardlm.github.io/WizardLM2/
- viksit 3y ago
  they released an announcement on this. > We are sorry for that. > It’s been a while since we’ve released a model months ago, so we’re unfamiliar with the new release process now: We accidentally missed an item required in the model release process - toxicity testing. > We are currently completing this test quickly and then will re-release our model as soon as possible. https://x.com/wizardlm_ai/status/1780101465950105775?s=46 https://x.com/wizardlm_ai/status/1780101465950105775?s=46
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - zer00eyz 3y ago
    Well that's interesting. It took a bunch of detective work, for what should have just been a NOTE on the read me on the repo. Is this why "science communicators" are needed? https://xkcd.com/1254/ https://xkcd.com/1254/ <<< very relevant.
    - marci 3y ago
      > https://xkcd.com/1254/ https://xkcd.com/1254/ <<< very relevant. This made me laugh so hard I hate it. I hate that it feels just like something I would do/have done.
  - kristjansson 3y ago
    very happy my first step with any model with big claims is 'huggingface-cli donwload ...'
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
padthai 3y ago
It is up again, as why it was down: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40061362 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40061362

abathur 3y ago

Looks like probably https://github.com/dumpmemory/megalodon https://github.com/dumpmemory/megalodon

bitvoid 3y ago
I think that is a fork before the actual repo was made private. XuezheMax's GitHub profile shows that his contributions in April were all to private repositories.
- abathur 3y ago
  Seems like a reasonable reading. It's only got 3 commits and 2 are from 18 hours ago--one of which fiddled the repo-made-public date and added the arxiv link--so perhaps there's a private working repo and they decided to make a ~clean public repo at the last minute (i.e., maybe the authors are self-conscious about the commit log).
- dartos 3y ago
  I wonder what happened
- elvircrn 3y ago
  Perhaps it was made private as part of a conference submission process?
  - amitport 3y ago
    Unlikely. Having code somewhere is OK, you just don't refer to it in the submitted version.
  - maleldil 3y ago
    If you link to a private repository, your GitHub profile can still be seen, which violates anonymity.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

lumost 3y ago

This happened to WizardLM2 yesterday as well https://wizardlm.github.io/WizardLM2/ https://wizardlm.github.io/WizardLM2/

viksit 3y ago
they released an announcement on this. > We are sorry for that. > It’s been a while since we’ve released a model months ago, so we’re unfamiliar with the new release process now: We accidentally missed an item required in the model release process - toxicity testing. > We are currently completing this test quickly and then will re-release our model as soon as possible. https://x.com/wizardlm_ai/status/1780101465950105775?s=46 https://x.com/wizardlm_ai/status/1780101465950105775?s=46
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- zer00eyz 3y ago
  Well that's interesting. It took a bunch of detective work, for what should have just been a NOTE on the read me on the repo. Is this why "science communicators" are needed? https://xkcd.com/1254/ https://xkcd.com/1254/ <<< very relevant.
  - marci 3y ago
    > https://xkcd.com/1254/ https://xkcd.com/1254/ <<< very relevant. This made me laugh so hard I hate it. I hate that it feels just like something I would do/have done.
- kristjansson 3y ago
  very happy my first step with any model with big claims is 'huggingface-cli donwload ...'

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

padthai 3y ago

It is up again, as why it was down: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40061362 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40061362