4 ms·
Similar! I think some of the flagship programs talk nonstop about LGBT and minority issues, but this has been a thing for some years. I remember pre COVID driv
by unethical_ban 3y ago
Similar!
I think some of the flagship programs talk nonstop about LGBT and minority issues, but this has been a thing for some years. I remember pre COVID driving to work chuckling at how every time I turned on the radio, it was a story on those topics.
There is a lot more going on in the world that can also be discussed.
I like Weekend edition and All Things Considered, and their hourly news updates.
Finally: there is a distinction between a faux "both sides" centrism and constant focus on identity. Having a liberal bias can exist while providing a wide range of coverage and de-emphasizing identity politics.
- 01HNNWZ0MV43FF 3y agoIf my local affiliate talked about LGBTQ stuff I would probably start turning the radio on again.
- superb_dev 3y agoIf we could solve these issues, maybe we could stop talking about them
- willis936 3y agoDoes force feeding develop an appetite?
- hackable_sand 3y ago[flagged]
- chris_wot 3y agoIt was a bad thing. Not sure how this negates the argument. It was bad back then, and it's bad now?
- willis936 3y agoForce feeding. NPR's stated goals are to tell stories with equitable representation but then take actions consistently contrary to that.
- lurking15 3y ago> What would you call a century of heteronormative, white media? Much better than whatever activist garbage we have now.
- p_j_w 3y ago[flagged]
- jimbokun 3y agoEven minorities sometimes want to hear about something other than being a minority.
- rayiner 3y agoEspecially minorities. Listening to liberal white people talk to other liberal white people about race is the eye-gougingly terrible.
- jimbokun 3y agoI’m white, but I often notice all white panels discussing how awful white people are, but somehow neglected to invite a non-white person to participate in the discussion.
- rayiner 3y agoAnd when they do, it’s someone they hand-picked to say the things they want to hear. I’ll note this though: I think the people who do this don’t really identify as “white.” It’s become a class marker. Your plumber is “white.” NPR listeners aren’t “white.”
- Loughla 3y agoWhat are you talking about? Honestly what weird strawman are you trying to set up? NPR listeners aren't white? What are you trying to say here?
- rayiner 3y ago“White” is a socially and culturally constructed label, not an ethnic group. For example, Germans and French people in those countries don’t identify as “white”—they identify as German and French. It’s a label created in the context of racial politics. My theory is that NPR listeners no longer really identify with the label “white.” They might acknowledge the label applies to them. But when they complain about “white people” they are referring to other white people.
- subsistence234 3y agoWhen progressive "solutions" are implemented, if their success is measured empirically at all, they usually just make things worse. See e.g. the outcome of most educational reforms of the past 20 years, or the attempts in America's most progressive cities to solve homelessness by incentivizing and rewarding homelessness. Not surprising, a lot of profitable rackets depend on those issues remaining unsolved. What would e.g. all the homelessness experts do, who collect billions annually to hold conferences where they agree with each other on settler-colonialism and the newest genders, if they were to actually solve homelessness? Climate change is being solved, but it's being solved through technological innovation, not masturbatory discourse.
- brightball 3y agoVirtually every person I talk to who remembers will tell you that the 90s were the peak of just about everybody in the country getting along and feeling good about the future. Then widespread internet and social media happened, which shortly led people into echo chambers while simultaneously gutting the institution of journalism.
- mr_toad 3y agoWe didn’t light the fire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots “the most destructive period of local unrest in U.S. history”
- Loughla 3y ago>90s were the peak of just about everybody in the country getting along and feeling good about the future. What? All joking aside, what the Fuck? Rodney King. LA riots. NAFTA protests. Branch Davidians. Presidential sex scandals. First desert storm. Political correctness. Women's movements. Bosnia et.al. Rwanda. HIV/AIDS epidemic. Ruby Ridge. Wage stagnation. The final death of small town commerce due to Wal-Marts. And these are just the things I thought of in the last minute. I'm sure there are a ton more issues I'm missing. The people you talk to are doing what people have done since the beginning of time. They're remembering the past fondly while forgetting the bad.
- everdrive 3y ago"Do you ever buy eggs at the super market? Well, here's how eggs are secretly racist, and the facts of egg economics disproportionally affects minorities."