3 ms·

I did some brief searching of their Twitter feed and in general but couldn't find any update on this. Does anyone know the current state of passive radar and K

• londons_explore 3y ago
  The lawyer likely advised not talking about it more publicly. Almost any lawyer won't present the world as black and white, but rather in quantities of risk - and even saying "we've taken the project down and it wont be coming back" is a risk if that attracts attention to your past distribution of the software and causes others to mirror it from archives.
  • Scoundreller 3y ago
    > quantities of risk Even that’s asking for a lot. Qualities of risk is more likely.
  • opello 3y ago
    Would it make sense to make some disclosure of "it's not coming back and no PRs adding similar functionality will be entertained for this reason?" Additionally, it seemed like this page[1] (discussed previously[2]) details some reasons why some publicly visible source code projects should be able to include code that implements things otherwise under export control. [1] https://www.unr.edu/sponsored-projects/compliance/export-controls/publicly-available https://www.unr.edu/sponsored-projects/compliance/export-con... [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40041198 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40041198