3 ms·
true, though i would guess that's mostly phones and it seems to be stagnating
by sambazi 3y ago
true, though i would guess that's mostly phones and it seems to be stagnating
- orangeboats 3y agoAPNIC stats show that assigned IPv6 /32 prefixes are still growing YoY. Wouldn't call that stagnating. https://rex.apnic.net/statistics?allocationType=asn,ipv4,ipv6&from=1982-12-13&to=2024-04-15&interval=year&rir=apnic,afrinic,arin,lacnic,ripencc https://rex.apnic.net/statistics?allocationType=asn,ipv4,ipv...
- sambazi 3y agowas referring to the google stats, which seems to be approaching 50% v6
- izacus 3y agoAnd those phones are behind an equivalence of CGNAT so the whole dream of "no NAT" is utterly not true for most IPv6 deployments.
- welterde 3y agoOnly for IPv4 destinations however, where there is no other way. For IPv6 destinations it's just native connectivity with no NAT.
- izacus 3y agoThrough a stateful firewall which blocks all incoming connections, completely invalidating "every device accessible" tenet of IPv6 and bringin zero value to the actual customers.