2 ms·
The claim that's made in this blog - that Kagi 'owns a t-shirt factory' seems disingenuous, or lazy at best. Kagi's own blog says that instead of going with a m
by sithadmin 2y ago
The claim that's made in this blog - that Kagi 'owns a t-shirt factory' seems disingenuous, or lazy at best. Kagi's own blog says that instead of going with a major branded merch manufacturer/distributor, they chose to work with a small print shop instead. Nothing about blowing funds on an actual factory/print shop. "Owning a merch operation end to end" just means they're not paying some manufacturer to do production, warehousing, order fulfillment/drop shipping, etc.
- baobabKoodaa 2y agoI do not understand this distinction. Either they "own" the merch operation "end to end", or they don't. You can't have it both ways.
- EasyMark 2y agoYou can contract facilities or output percentage. You don't have to only "own it end to end" or not.
- baobabKoodaa 2y agoIf you contract facilities then you don't "own" the merch operation "end to end".
- wasmitnetzen 2y agoKagi's post says further down that they > allocate[d] nearly a third of our investor-raised funds to produce and freely distribute 20,000 t-shirts Though it sounds like they don't actually own "a t-shirt factory", but rather a t-shirt distributor.