2 ms·
I should have added to my statement "by now". I think things tend towards disclosure. We had coverups in the UK of rape gangs operating in northern towns which
by gadders 3y ago
I should have added to my statement "by now".
I think things tend towards disclosure. We had coverups in the UK of rape gangs operating in northern towns which was eventually came to light after many years. I think if there are significant vaccine harms they will come to light. I don't know that if those harms exist they would have come to light by now.
- orwin 3y agoThe more people are involved, the most likely it is that it will be leaked shortly after. Intentionally harmful vaccines would incredibly hard to pull off.
- gadders 3y ago>>Intentionally harmful vaccines would incredibly hard to pull off. Oh, I don't think it was intentional. Just a (hypothetical, not confirmed) unintentional side effect.
- orwin 3y agoBut here, you're not in a conspiracy theory (or conspiracy myth as some would say). You have a falsifiable theory, "This specific vaccine have harmful side effects", you're not the only one. In France, we thought the HB vaccine increased SLS risks for a decade+: it was further enhanced by allergic reactions to some bad dosage, and some double vaccination during the 93 campaign (my mother was double vaccinated and reacted poorly the second time). I know several people who waited for the non-RNA vaccine because they wanted to wait for more data before using new techniques, it isn't a conspiracy theory, just prudence. I disagree but i certainly respect the choice.