3 ms·
This is the same report which is happy to make claims such as: “For many centuries transgender people have been predominantly trans females", and then leaves it
by yoshuaw 3y ago
This is the same report which is happy to make claims such as: “For many centuries transgender people have been predominantly trans females", and then leaves it as an exercise to the reader to divine how they arrived at that. The entire report is full of similar claims and does not seem to meet the bar we have for peer-reviewed science.
This is the same report cited by the linked article. It will take time to review the entire 300 page report, but as it stands it seems unlikely it will hold up to scrutiny over time.
- IlIlIllI 3y agoDoes it really matter if this small piece of background information is unsourced? A historical treatment of trans identity isn't the focus of the report. Seems like rather an irrelevant criticism to be honest. I don't quite understand why you believe this to be a problem, or why you think this somehow undermines the rest of the work.