3 ms·
I’m not disputing any discourse relating to the factual in/correctness of the anecdote, I’m pointing out that gp is providing an anecdote while disputing anecdo
by hsbauauvhabzb 3y ago
I’m not disputing any discourse relating to the factual in/correctness of the anecdote, I’m pointing out that gp is providing an anecdote while disputing anecdotes that they don’t agree with.
Provide actual data that’s recent. Linux 4.x was what, 10 years ago? Cars are substantially safer now than they were 10/20/50 years ago, so whose to say your experience with a file system would be different?
- Haemm0r 3y agoSame could be said about cars: Why ever buy a [insert brand] again after you've been burned by its reliabity or other issues? You probably just don't, as the alternatives are good and plenty.
- frankjr 3y ago> You probably just don't, as the alternatives are good and plenty. Which cannot be said about file systems on Linux which support metadata+data checksum and repair though. As far as I'm aware the only file systems which could realistically be used are btrfs and zfs (bcachefs looks promising but not there yet). Zfs is not even a part of the kernel and you have to compile it yourself and hope it does actually compile against your kernel due to API changes.
- Haemm0r 3y agoTrue dat.. :-) Just wanted to point out, that it is "normal" for people to avoid the thing that did not work out for them in the past.
- grumpyprole 3y agoIt's unfortunately a very common anecdote over the last 10 years (and a similar experience to my own). And to be honest, it's a red flag with how this critical system component is being developed.
- yau8edq12i 3y agoWhat changed with respect to car safety compared to 2014? If anything, the recent trend of putting every control in touchscreen interfaces has made cars less safe.