>This whole thread is about the ruling on this case. So you are saying no one can discuss the 5th circuit in general in response to one of its rulings? One mig

>This whole thread is about the ruling on this case. So you are saying no one can discuss the 5th circuit in general in response to one of its rulings? One might even say "this ruling is reasonable, but that court sure hasn't been lately" and you'd still say the same. Get a grip! >Incidentally, nobody including you has mentioned what about this ruling is "wild" and "twisted" yet despite numerous requests to do so. Are you aware how discussions on a subject matter are conducted? I never said any of those things. You are really picking the wrong bone with me.