4 ms·
> But everyday users are right to distrust software downloaded from the Internet. They're right to distrust apps that run in their browsers too, but that hasn'
by autoexec 3y ago
> But everyday users are right to distrust software downloaded from the Internet.
They're right to distrust apps that run in their browsers too, but that hasn't stopped anybody. These days everyone is scared to death of an .exe but will happily execute whatever random code a stranger on the internet comes up with if they only have to click on a link to run it on their devices. Warnings that WASM is a malware author's dream weren't enough (https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/ecriminals-increasingly-use-webassembly-to-hide-malware/ https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/ecriminals-increasingly-use...) and browser sandbox escapes happen all the time but nobody seems to care. I can't even just pick on WASM, JS isn't much better and even CSS/HTML alone is getting complex enough that it can be used maliciously.
- Dylan16807 3y ago> browser sandbox escapes happen all the time Far far rarer than downloading a virus. > WASM is a malware author's dream weren't enough (https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/ecriminals-increasingly-use-webassembly-to-hide-malware/ https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/ecriminals-increasingly-use...) Because it can run a crypto miner, really? Using it for obfuscation doesn't really change anything. A coder that wants to obfuscate things could already run their own interpreter and/or use asm.js.